Weight Watchers Thrown for a Loss in EEOC Lawsuit

Clifford Geiger
Clifford Geiger
12/13/2013
A federal judge recently denied Weight Watchers’ attempt to dismiss  a Pregnancy Discrimination Act lawsuit filed against it by the EEOC.   EEOC v. The WW Group, Inc., d/b/a Weight Watchers, Case 2:12-cv-11124 PDB-MAR (E.D. Mich. Dec. 2, 2013). The suit claims that the company did not permit Wendy Lamond-Broughton (“Broughton”) to apply for a job because she was pregnant.  The company defended on the grounds that Broughton was not...
read more

Appellate Court Reverses NLRB and Upholds Legality of Class Action Waivers

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
12/04/2013
Employers scored a big victory yesterday when the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed the National Labor Relations Board's D.R Horton ruling, which invalidated an employer's arbitration agreement containing a waiver of an employee's right to file class-action claims. D.R. Horton v. NLRB, 5th Cir No. 12-60031 (12/3/13).  The decision will make it  easier for employers to enforce class-action waivers, including waivers of...
read more

Supreme Court to Decide ACA Contraceptive Mandate Issue

Darrell VanDeusen
Darrell VanDeusen
12/02/2013
There has been a lot of discussion on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) over the past few months. Congress has been twisting about it; the Obama administration has been pilloried over it. But one branch of government was missing in the recent theatrics.  Not anymore.  On November 26, the Supreme Court threw its hat in the ring too, agreeing to consider the validity of the women’s preventive services mandate in two companion cases, Sebelius v. Hobby...
read more

Employee Who Was Repeatedly Sniffed by Co-Workers and Fired For Swatting a Fly May Bring Retaliation Claim

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
11/26/2013
Accusations of coworkers repeatedly “sniffing and hovering.”  An employee terminated allegedly because she slammed a door and “swatted a fly harder than necessary.”  Sounds like a great place to work, doesn’t it?  This is the alleged work environment in a recent lawsuit decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Royal v. CCC&R Tres Arboles, LLC,  No. 12-11022 (5th Cir. Nov. 21, 2013). Tonia Royal worked as...
read more

Profanity-Laced Facebook Exchange Not Protected By NLRA

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
11/25/2013
On November 12, 2013, a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) administrative law judge (ALJ) concluded that discharged employees forfeited their rights under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) when their Facebook conversation includes comments about being insubordinate and disruptive in the workplace. The Richmond District Neighborhood Center (“Richmond”) is a California-based non-profit corporation.  Richmond operates after...
read more

No Sex Harassment Liability When Female Prison Guard Exposed to Prisoners' Display of Sexual Materials

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
11/25/2013
Is a correctional facility where inmates (but not employees) openly display sexually suggestive materials in violation of the facility’s policies a hostile work environment for a correctional officer?   No, according to a November 20, 2013 ruling by the Eastern District of California.  Daniels v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr. & Rehab., No. 2:10-cv-00003-MCE-AC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2013). The plaintiff in the lawsuit, Maria Aguilar, worked for the...
read more

Appellate Court Rejects Use of Title II of the ADA to Sue for Discrimination In Public Employment

As regular readers of The Employment Brief are aware, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) provides the basis for many lawsuits filed by current and former employees.  In the employment law arena, plaintiffs usually rely upon Title I of the ADA, which specifically prohibits employment discrimination based on a persons’ disability.  42 U.S.C. 12112(a). Government employees, however, sometimes rely upon Title II of the ADA when filing suit...
read more

Exhaustion of FMLA Leave with No Return Date Dooms Plaintiff’s Claims

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
11/18/2013
In Owens v. Calhoun County School District, No. 12-60897 (Oct. 8, 2013), the Fifth Circuit upheld a district court’s granting of summary judgment to an employer on a former employee’s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) claim. Karen Darlene Mann Owens taught at Bruce Upper Elementary School in Mississippi for seventeen years until she was fired in February 2010.  Owens suffered from neck and back pain, conditions which worsened over the...
read more

Court Finds Odor Sensitivity May Be Disability under ADAAA

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
11/15/2013
It seems like even the most minor ailment can make an employee “disabled” under the ADA these days.  For example, in 2010, the City of Detroit paid $100,000 to settle an accommodation claim raised by a “chemically sensitive” city worker who alleged that a coworker’s perfume and room deodorizer caused her to experience migraines, nausea and coughing.  McBride v. City of Detroit, No. 2:07-cv-12794 (E.D. Mich. 2010).  Last week, an...
read more

Texas Court Strikes Down FLSA Collective Action

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
11/14/2013
Over the past few years, employers have been besieged by "collective actions" filed under federal and state wage and hour laws. These lawsuits aggregate individual claims for unpaid overtime into class actions, thereby making it much more lucrative for a plaintiff's attorney to invest the time and effort into pursuing the case. In  Jones v. Xerox Commercial Solutions, LLC, No. 4:13-cv-650 (S.D. Tex., November 6, 2013), a federal court in Texas...
read more
Email Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Loading