ACA's Employer Mandate Delayed For Some Businesses

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
02/13/2014
On Monday, the Obama administration delayed a significant portion of the employer mandate requirement of the Affordable Care Act.  You may recall that employers with more than 50 employees were supposed to offer qualifying health insurance by 2014 or incur fines.  At the request of the business community, that requirement was pushed back to 2015.  On Monday, the Treasury Department postponed the deadline until 2016 for employers with between 50...
read more

Fourth Circuit FindsTemporary Impairment Covered by ADAAA

Darrell VanDeusen
Darrell VanDeusen
02/01/2014
It was pretty clear under the ADA that a temporary impairment was not a covered “disability.” But that was before Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act (the “ADAAA”) in 2008, expanding the scope of protection.   Now, the Fourth Circuit has become the first appellate court to address the issue of “temporary impairment” under the ADAAA. Summers v. Altarum Inst., Corp., (4th Cir. January 23, 2014). Reversing...
read more

Supreme Court Unanimous: Steel Workers Were Just Changing Clothes

Darrell VanDeusen
Darrell VanDeusen
01/29/2014
The issue of what constitutes “compensable time” under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is, for most employers, not so difficult to figure out: you clock in, you work, you get paid.   There are, however, some occupations where things are less clear. What if you have to put on a uniform (a police officer or fast food server)?  Well, if you can put it on at home and drive to work, you do not get paid for “doffing and donning,” as it is...
read more

FMLA Case Goes to Jury, Says Tenth Circuit

Darrell VanDeusen
Darrell VanDeusen
01/27/2014
Employers who decide to fire an employee for a work rule violation usually feel pretty secure in the decision when the employee has admitted to the infraction. But it is important to remember that, in discrimination or retaliation cases, the real question is “how has the employer treated other employees in similar circumstances?” The need to focus on this “similarly situated” factor, as well as the possible “bad facts” in a case, was...
read more

Fourth Circuit Overturns $1.6 Million Dollar Verdict in Race Discrimination Case

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
01/23/2014
When the Washington Bullets (remember them?) won the 1978 NBA Championship, Coach Dick Motta inspired fans with the phrase "the opera ain't over till the fat lady sings."  That phrase came to mind this week when I read about a decision reversing a $1.6 million dollar verdict against CSX Transportation in a race discrimination case.  Bennett v. CSX Transportation, 4th Cir. No. 12-2477 ( unpublished 1/21/14). In Bennett, an African-American former...
read more

Federal Courts Considering Revisions to Electronic Discovery Rules

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
01/21/2014
As any employer who has been through a federal court lawsuit can attest, litigation costs make the defense of employment lawsuits a costly proposition. In many cases, the costs of defense are greater than the potential recovery if the employee wins the case. Perhaps the biggest driver  of litigation costs is what has become known as "electronic discovery" or "e-discovery."  This is the process of  preserving, reviewing,  and disclosing emails...
read more

Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Validity of NLRB Recess Appointments

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
01/17/2014
It turns out that schoolchildren aren’t the only ones who care about how long recess is.  On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning, No. 12-1281, a case that is expected to decide how to allocate power between the President and Senate when it comes to recess appointments and could result in the invalidation of hundreds of NLRB decisions . For those unfamiliar with the case, by January 3,...
read more

Recording Supervisor's Racially Offensive Remarks Leads to Reduced Jury Verdict

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
01/15/2014
Baiting your supervisor to make racially offensive comments while secretly recording the conversation might seem like a great way to score a big settlement out of your employer.  However, that strategy can prove to be something of a double-edged sword -- at least  in the eyes of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.  Johnson v. STRIVE E. Harlem Emp’t Grp., No. 1:12-cv-04460 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 2014). Rob...
read more

Maryland Commission on Civil Rights Issues Poster for New Pregnancy Discrimination Law

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
01/13/2014
As we have previously reported, on October 1, 2013, the Reasonable Accommodations for Disabilities Due to Pregnancy Act took effect for Maryland employers who have 15 or more employees. The new law requires that, unless an employer can show undue hardship, it must provide pregnant employees with various categories of accommodations upon request, including: changing the employee’s job duties; changing the employee’s work hours; relocating the...
read more

Some Thoughts on the ADA

Frank Kollman
Frank Kollman
01/10/2014
There was a thoughtful piece in the Wall Street Journal today written by Joni Eareckson Tada, who happens to be quadriplegic.  She was commenting on a recent "wrongful birth" case and efforts by some legislatures to legalize euthanasia of people with disabilities.  I think the following paragraph summarizes her thoughts: This winter, the American Medical Association classified obesity as a disability. We need to make up our minds. We cannot...
read more
Email Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Loading