NLRB ISSUES COMPLAINT AGAINST HOSPITAL FOR SCHEDULING ITS OWN EMPLOYEES

Peter Saucier
Peter Saucier
06/05/2015
One thing about which unions and employers ordinarily agree is that it is the right and obligation of management to manage. Employers want to manage and unions want to retain the right to claim that the employer did not manage when it should have done so. That makes a recent decision by the NLRB to issue a complaint against a hospital interesting. Armstrong County Memorial Hospital, No. 6-CA-144586, complaint issued 5/27/15. In 2014, licensed...
read more

NLRB Strikes Down Employer's "No-Button" Rule

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
05/11/2015
Another day, another employer policy that violates employees’ Section 7 rights. In this case, Boch Imports, Inc. and International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, case 01-CA-083551, the Board was asked to review an employer’s social media policy and prohibition against certain clothing and pins. Not surprisingly, the Board found these actions impermissibly restrained employees’ rights to discuss the terms and conditions of...
read more

DOL Announces Revised Overtime Regulations

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
05/06/2015
Secretary of Labor Thomas Perez reported on the Department’s blog yesterday that he has submitted a proposed revised rule to the Office of Management and Budget to address what President Obama believes are  deficiencies in federal laws governing overtime pay. Working off the assumption that overtime pay rules have eroded over the years and that a high number of salaried workers who should be getting overtime are not eligible for overtime pay, the...
read more

Supreme Court Rules That Courts May Review Whether The EEOC Has Satisfied Its Duty To Attempt Presuit Conciliation

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
04/30/2015
On April 29, 2015, the Supreme Court unanimously vacated a Seventh Circuit decision holding that courts cannot delve into whether the EEOC satisfied the conciliation requirement of Title VII. The EEOC has a legal duty to try settling cases first, but the question before the Court was how much a court could peer into those negotiations to ensure that the EEOC acted in good faith. Ruling against the agency, the Court gave employers a new, albeit...
read more

EEOC Issues Proposed Rule on Workplace Wellness Programs

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
04/17/2015
On April 16, 2015, the EEOC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ("NPRM") on how the ADA applies to employer wellness programs that are part of a group health plan.  The NPRM will be published in the Federal Register on April 20, 2015, and the public will have a 60 day period within which to file comments.  The EEOC may then revise the rule based on the comments before taking final action to implement it. Under Title I of the ADA, employers are...
read more

Supreme Court Okays DOL's FLSA Interpretative Rule Change

The Supreme Court has confirmed that federal agencies, including the Department of Labor (DOL), are exempted from the Administrative Procedure Act's formal notice-and-comment rulemaking requirements when changing interpretative rules, as explained in its unanimous decision Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Ass'n, No. 13-1041, (U.S. March 9, 2015).  With this decision, the Supreme Court overruled the long established doctrine from Paralyzed Veterans of...
read more

Department of Labor Issues Revision To Definition of Spouse Under FMLA

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
03/05/2015
On February 25, 2015, the Department of Labor issued a Final Rule changing the definition of “spouse” under the Family and Medical Leave Act.  The Final Rule impacts those individuals who entered into legal same-sex marriages in a state that recognizes same-sex marriage, but now reside in a state that does not.  The prior iteration of the Rule defined “spouse” (29 CFR §§ 825.102 and 825.122(b)) based on the residency of the eligible...
read more

Fourth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of EEOC Background Check Claims

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
02/24/2015
On February 20, the Fourth Circuit became the second jurisdiction to reject the EEOC’s most recent attempt to expand disparate impact race claims. In EEOC v. Freeman, the Fourth Circuit affirmed summary judgment in favor of an employer in a case involving a challenge by the EEOC to the use of criminal background and credit history checks in the hiring process. The decision marks the second time in less than a year that the EEOC’s tactic has been...
read more

Supreme Court to Determine Scope of Judicial Review on EEOC Conciliation Process

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
01/21/2015
Under what circumstances may a court scrutinize the EEOC’s claim that conciliation has failed? The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in Mach Mining v. EEOC to address this precise issue. No. 13-1019 (Jan. 13, 2015). Although the vast majority of employment discrimination claims each year are brought by private parties, the EEOC possesses authority under Title VII to sue employers on behalf of an aggrieved employee(s), but only after...
read more

NLRB Defers Ruling on Legality of Employer Email Policies

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
09/30/2014
For the past six months, legal prognosticators (myself included) have told readers that when the NLRB issues a ruling in the Purple Communications case, we'd have a new standard for what restrictions, if any, employers may place on employee use of company email systems.  On September 24, 2014, the Board issued its ruling.  And the answer is ..... "check back with us later (probably after the November election)." Purple Communications provides sign...
read more
Email Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Loading