Department of Labor Issues Revision To Definition of Spouse Under FMLA

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
03/05/2015
On February 25, 2015, the Department of Labor issued a Final Rule changing the definition of “spouse” under the Family and Medical Leave Act.  The Final Rule impacts those individuals who entered into legal same-sex marriages in a state that recognizes same-sex marriage, but now reside in a state that does not.  The prior iteration of the Rule defined “spouse” (29 CFR §§ 825.102 and 825.122(b)) based on the residency of the eligible...
read more

Fourth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of EEOC Background Check Claims

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
02/24/2015
On February 20, the Fourth Circuit became the second jurisdiction to reject the EEOC’s most recent attempt to expand disparate impact race claims. In EEOC v. Freeman, the Fourth Circuit affirmed summary judgment in favor of an employer in a case involving a challenge by the EEOC to the use of criminal background and credit history checks in the hiring process. The decision marks the second time in less than a year that the EEOC’s tactic has been...
read more

Supreme Court to Determine Scope of Judicial Review on EEOC Conciliation Process

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
01/21/2015
Under what circumstances may a court scrutinize the EEOC’s claim that conciliation has failed? The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in Mach Mining v. EEOC to address this precise issue. No. 13-1019 (Jan. 13, 2015). Although the vast majority of employment discrimination claims each year are brought by private parties, the EEOC possesses authority under Title VII to sue employers on behalf of an aggrieved employee(s), but only after...
read more

NLRB Defers Ruling on Legality of Employer Email Policies

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
09/30/2014
For the past six months, legal prognosticators (myself included) have told readers that when the NLRB issues a ruling in the Purple Communications case, we'd have a new standard for what restrictions, if any, employers may place on employee use of company email systems.  On September 24, 2014, the Board issued its ruling.  And the answer is ..... "check back with us later (probably after the November election)." Purple Communications provides sign...
read more

Congress Considering Bills for a More “Transparent” EEOC

Darrell VanDeusen
Darrell VanDeusen
09/23/2014
Any lawyer who has defended an employer sued by the EEOC knows that sometimes – not always – it can be a real challenge, facing an unrelenting assault by a government agency that seems bent on destruction. Sure, you might run into a private practice plaintiff’s lawyer who is uncivil, who is unwilling to discuss reasonable settlement terms, and whose mission in life is to ratchet up attorneys’ fees and/or drive the employer into bankruptcy....
read more

Wellness Plans - No Good Deed Goes Unpunished?

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
09/05/2014
Wellness plans have been around for quite some time, and in varying forms.  Employers are, more often and with regularity, implementing some category of wellness plan for multiple reasons: healthier workforce, better attendance and productivity, higher morale, lower health insurance costs, and the like. Indeed, the Affordable Care Act permits employers to offer financial incentives to employees to encourage participation in these programs. The...
read more

DOL Issues Guidance Concerning Gender Identity and Transgender Status

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
08/25/2014
On August 19, 2014, the Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) issued guidance concerning enforcement actions for gender or transgender discrimination. This guidance follows up on President Obama’s Executive Order 13672, which added gender identity and sexual orientation as protected categories in federal employment and contracting. The DOL guidance makes clear that the OFCCP – the agency charged with...
read more

Mercedes Denied the Luxury of Overly Broad No Solicitation Rule

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
07/28/2014
On July 24, 2014, a National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB")  Administrative Law Judge  ruled that Mercedes-Benz violated the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA") by prohibiting distribution of literature in "team centers" inside its Vance, Alabama plant.  Mercedes-Benz U.S. Int'l, Inc., No. 10-CA-112406.  The ALJ held that because the "team centers" were used for both work purposes and as employee break and meal rooms, the car maker could not...
read more

NLRB General Counsel Offers Input on Practical Effects of Noel Canning

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
07/11/2014
As discussed recently, the Supreme Court’s decision in NLRB v. Noel Canning is expected to have significant ramifications for the NLRB (the “Board”) and the parties who previously appeared before the Board in 2012 and the first half of 2013, when the unconstitutional recess appointments of Members Block, Flynn and Griffin continued to leave the NLRB without a quorum.  Richard Griffin, one of the three recess appointees who was since confirmed...
read more

Supreme Court Issues Unanimous Decision, "Canning" Obama's Recess NLRB Appointments

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
06/27/2014
As part of its end of term productivity, on Thursday, June 26, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its much anticipated decision in NLRB v. Noel Canning,  regarding President Obama’s authority to grant recess appointments to fill vacant Board positions and avoid the Senate confirmation process of those Board members. The Noel Canning decision specifically involved President Obama’s recess appointments of Sharon Block, Terence Flynn, and Richard...
read more
Email Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Loading