Main Menu

Supreme Court Decisions

Supreme Court Grants Certiorari On LGBT Discrimination Issues

By on April 24, 2019 in Sexual Orientation, Supreme Court Decisions

On April 22, 2019, the Supreme Court granted certiorariin three cases relating to Title VII’s coverage (or noncoverage) of workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation and/or transgender status.  Those cases are Bostock v. Clayton County, GA(No. 17-1618), Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda(No. 17-1623), and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v. EEOC (No. 18-107). The […]

Supreme Court to Decide if EEOC Charge Filing is Jurisdictional or Administrative

By on January 16, 2019 in Employment Discrimination, Supreme Court Decisions

The Supreme Court has granted a writ certiorari to address the question of whether Title VII’s requirement of the need to file a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) before going to court is a jurisdictional or administrative exhaustion requirement.  The case comes from the Fifth Circuit and has been bouncing around the lower […]

Supreme Court Rules That Public Sector Agency Fees Are Unconstitutional

By on June 27, 2018 in Labor Law, Public Sector Employment Law, Supreme Court Decisions

On the last opinion day of the 2017-2018 term, the Supreme Court issued a long-expected decision prohibiting public sector collective bargaining agreements from requiring employees who are not members of the union to pay agency fees. In a 5-4 decision written by Justice Alito, the Court overturned 41 year old precedent and ruled that requiring […]

Uber Driver Must Ride Solo: Class Action Waiver Enforced Post Epic Systems

By on June 8, 2018 in Arbitration, Class Actions, Supreme Court Decisions

On May 21, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, which we previously discussed at length.  That case, which upheld class action waivers in favor of individual arbitration, forces Gustavo Camilo to individually arbitrate his claim that Uber illegally charged him and other drivers a workers’ compensation fee. Just a […]

Supreme Court Dodges Sticky Issues in Same-Sex Wedding Cake Case

By on June 6, 2018 in Employment Discrimination, Same-Sex Marriage, Sexual Orientation, Supreme Court Decisions

Both sides of the political divide had been eagerly awaiting the decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.  The Supreme Court’s decision, however, largely left the central issue of the case unresolved. This case involves a Colorado baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple in 2012 because […]

No Overtime This Time… Supreme Court Holds Service Advisors Are Exempt Under The FLSA

By on April 4, 2018 in Supreme Court Decisions, Wage & Hour

On April 2, 2018, the Supreme Court, with its second consideration of the same case, held in a 5-4 decision, that automobile service advisors are exempt from overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).  In Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, the Supreme Court held that service advisers fall under the FLSA exemption applicable to “any […]

Class Actions, Collective Bargaining and a Colorado Cakeshop: Why The Supreme Court’s Fall Term Matters for Employers

By on October 3, 2017 in Supreme Court Decisions

The 2017-2018 Supreme Court  term could be a very significant one for employment law.  With a newly constituted conservative majority, the Court is poised to decide three cases that will likely have far-reaching implications on public sector collective bargaining, class action litigation, and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Are Class Action Waivers in […]

The Supreme Court Delivers Some Bad News To The Post Office

By on May 24, 2016 in Employment Discrimination, Legal Developments, Limitations, Supreme Court Decisions

Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Green v. Brennan, U.S. No. 14-613 (May 23, 2016), holding that the statute of limitations for a former Postmaster’s Title VII constructive discharge claim begins on the date he gave notice of his resignation, and not on the date of the employer’s alleged last discriminatory act. Former […]