The Employment Brief | Employment Law | Kollman, Saucier & Jackson, P.A.

Pharmacist Needled Out Of $2.6M Jury Award

Kollman, Saucier, & Jackson

03/31/2017

Employment Discrimination, Reasonable Accommodations/Undue Burden

A pharmacist with trypanophobia (a fear of needles, yes I had to Google that), worked for Rite Aid Corp. (and its predecessors) for 34 years. In 2011, Rite Aid made administering immunizations an explicit job requirement for its pharmacists. The needle-fearing pharmacist submitted medical notes about his trypanophobia which explained his blood pressure would spike, he would get anxious and lightheaded at the sight of a needle, and could faint,...

Kollman, Saucier, & Jackson

03/28/2017

Employment Discrimination, Sexual Orientation

In a case that has been closely watched, in Christiansen v. Omnicorp Grp., Inc., No. 16-749 (2d Cir. March 27, 2017), a three-judge panel of the Second Circuit decided that a gay, HIV-positive employee is not able to pursue a claim of sexual orientation discrimination under Title VII, concluding that Title VII does not protect against gay bias. The Second Circuit cut to the case and concluded that absent a ruling by the Supreme Court, or a full...

Kollman, Saucier, & Jackson

03/22/2017

Labor Law

Readers of this blog are probably familiar with how the appellate court system works. A party appeals a judge’s factual ruling to an appellate court, which then reviews the lower court’s decision. Appeals from federal trial courts and federal regulatory boards are usually heard by that circuit’s court of appeal (i.e. the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit). Appeals from the federal appellate courts’ three judge panels...

Kollman, Saucier, & Jackson

03/17/2017

Legislative Developments, State Law

There is a little over a month left before the Maryland General Assembly adjourns its 2017 legislative session. Below is a list of some of the employment-related bills that thelegislature is considering or has considered. House Bill 1, the Maryland Healthy Working Families Act, was summarized in a previous blog post. HB 1 has passed the House and is being considered by the Senate. HB 1 was cross-filed with Senate Bill 230, which the Senate...

Kollman, Saucier, & Jackson

03/15/2017

Disability & Leave, Employment Discrimination

A recent decision out of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, Caldwell v. KHOU-TV, No. 16-20408 (5th Cir. March 6, 2017), offers an obvious, but important, reminder for employers -- provide consistent reasons for why you make employment decisions. Be honest. Be consistent. Don’t make stuff up. Otherwise, plaintiff-employees may be able to assail your explanation when and if litigation ensues. In Caldwell, the plaintiff claimed that he was...

Kollman, Saucier, & Jackson

03/08/2017

Virginia Employment Law, Wrongful Discharge

On February 23, 2017, the Virginia Supreme Court sustained a demurrer to a complaint alleging a Bowman claim of wrongful termination. Francis v. National Accrediting Commission of Career Arts & Sciences, Inc. No. 160267. The Court rejected an employee's claims that the public policy embodied in Virginia Code §§ 19.2-152.7:1 through 19.2-152.10 (the Protective Order Statutes) provides the basis for a wrongful discharge claim. According to...

Kollman, Saucier, & Jackson

03/02/2017

Trade Secrets & Restictive Covenants, Virginia Employment Law

On February 14, 2017, a federal judge denied a home builders’ motion for a preliminary injunction to stop a former employee covered by a non-compete agreement from working for a competing builder. Applying Virginia law, Judge Liam O’Grady of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division, ruled that the geographic scope of the non-compete was overbroad and, therefore, the agreement was invalid. NVR,...

Kollman, Saucier, & Jackson

02/24/2017

Age Discrimination, Employment Contracts, Employment Discrimination

Employers often think that not renewing an employee’s contract is somehow qualitatively different from a termination of employment. In some cases, and in certain limited circumstances, that may be true. It is not true, however, with regard to statutory retaliation claims (e.g., my contract was not renewed because I engaged in activity protected by Title VII, the ADA, the FLSA, or some other statute containing anti-retaliation provisions). In...

Kollman, Saucier, & Jackson

02/24/2017

Age Discrimination, Disparate Impact, Employment Discrimination

A federal judge in California recently ruled that PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLC (“PwC”) must defend against a class action claim of unintentional age discrimination. Rabin v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, No. 16-cv-02276-JST (N.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2017). On April 17, 2016, Steve Rabin, on behalf of himself and other similarly situated unsuccessful job applicants, filed a putative class action alleging that PwC maintains hiring policies and other...

< 1 … 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 … 128 >

Email Updates

Pharmacist Needled Out Of $2.6M Jury Award

Second Circuit Holds Sexual Orientation Not Protected By Title VII

If At First You Don’t Succeed, Try Again

Maryland Legislative Update

Employer’s Inconsistent Explanations Permits Claim To Survive Summary Judgment

Virginia Supreme Court Affirms Dismissal of Bowman Claim Based on Protective Order Statutes

Virginia Court Strikes Down Homebuilder's Non-Compete Agreement

Non-Renewal of Contract or Termination?

Split Developing On ADEA Disparate Impact Claims

Email Updates