"Not Willful" Is Not The Same As "No Bad Faith" - A Lesson In FLSA Liquidated Damages

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
08/06/2019
After a jury verdict was returned in favor of a group of Baltimore nightclub exotic dancers for their claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and Maryland wage and hour law against the nightclub owner and the two nightclub entities, the presiding Magistrate Judge also awarded liquidated damages to the plaintiffs.  The club owner appealed on various grounds including questioning how the judge was able to award liquidated damages when the jury had...
read more

Employee’s Medical Leave Can Be An Adverse Employment Action If Caused By Discriminatory Comments

A recent case out of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois demonstrates how a supervisor’s repeated derogatory comments about an employee’s Middle Eastern background and religion that forced her to take medical leave became a triable discrimination claim.  Odisho v. U.S. Bancorp, Inc., No. 16 C 11121 (N.D. Ill. 7/24/19). Juliet Odisho worked as a Structured Finance Analyst for US Bank (“Bank”) where she reported...
read more

Court Finds Client Remark About “Rednecks” To Be Direct Evidence Of Discrimination

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
08/01/2019
I recently blogged about a case where a supervisor told an employee that she “[couldn’t] stand [his] black ass” in an altercation that culminated in the employee’s termination.  There, despite the closeness in time between the comment and the employment decision at issue, the court found insufficient evidence of unlawful discrimination, and the employer won the case. More recently, a case out of Maryland’s federal district court...
read more

Documentation of Performance Issues Defeats Employee’s Claims of Retaliation

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
07/31/2019
Employers may find it concerning when their employees with performance issues also complain of workplace discrimination.  A recent decision out of the Eastern District of Virginia illustrates how progressive discipline, documentation of employee work performance problems, and investigation of employee workplace complaints can help protect employers in the long run.  Gooding-Williams v. Fairfax County School Board, No. 1:18-cv-01177 (E.D....
read more

Separation Code That Raises Red Flags Can Constitute Post-Settlement Retaliation

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
07/29/2019
When serious problems in the workplace arise, a settlement and release that allows the employer and employee to go their separate ways often presents as an attractive resolution.  The employee can separate neutrally to look for a more suited work environment, while the employer can move on without fear of litigation.  Unless of course the agreement fails to properly address prospective employer inquiries, in which case an employer may well find...
read more

Arbitrator’s Alleged Bias Against Homosexuals Is Not Grounds to Reverse Award

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
07/26/2019
Recently, a California Court of Appeal rejected a plaintiff/appellant’s claim that his case against his former employer -- which went to arbitration pursuant to their employment agreement -- should be reversed due to the arbitrator’s alleged undisclosed bias against homosexuals.  Bogue v. Anesthesia Service Medical Group, Inc., No. D073518 (Cal. App. 4th Dist. 7/17/19) (unpublished). Dr. Bogue was an anesthesiologist for Anesthesia Service...
read more

Third Circuit Rules Offensive Facebook Posts Did Not Create Hostile Work Environment

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
07/26/2019
Social media is a huge part of our lives these days, and many businesses use various social media platforms to their benefit.  However, a recent case out of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals demonstrates just how social media can become a medium for employees to harass one another and implicate liability for an employer.  Chinery v. American Airlines, No. 18-3118 (3d Cir. 7/25/19). Chinery worked as a flight attendant for American...
read more

Virginia Court Dismisses Late-Filed Discrimination Suit

The Americans With Disabilities Act, like most other federal anti-discrimination statutes, requires that an employee file suit within 90 days of their receipt of a Right to Sue Notice from the Equal Employment Opportunity  Commission.  A Virginia man recently found out that federal courts take this requirement seriously when the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia dismissed his disability discrimination suit because it...
read more

Fourth Circuit Rejects Employee’s Claim of Mexican Heritage Bias

Direct, qualification, and comparator evidence, oh my!  In a recent decision, the Fourth Circuit recounted the ways in which a former utility distribution serviceman failed to prove discrimination in violation of Title VII and Section 1981.  Matias v. Elon University, No. 18-2507 (4th Cir. 7/22/19) (unpublished). Matias, who is Mexican, worked for Elon University from 1999 to 2016.  After being promoted to utility distribution...
read more

NLRA Does Not Protect Employee’s Wrongful Access Of Confidential Data

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
07/22/2019
Under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), employees have the right to discuss their wages with colleagues.  The NLRA does not give employees who surreptitiously access wage data the right to discuss that information with colleagues, however.  In an advice memorandum released July 16, the National Labor Relations Board’s Office of the General Counsel provides a reminder that employees who cross the line by improperly obtaining wage...
read more
Email Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Loading