Undocumented Workers Not Eligible for Back Pay Under NLRA

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
08/12/2011
In Mezonos Maven Bakery Inc., 357 N.L.R.B. No 47 (Aug. 9, 2011), a unanimous three-member panel held that the National Labor Relations Act and Supreme Court precedent in Hoffman Plastic Compounds Inc. v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137 (2002) “forecloses us from awarding back pay to undocumented workers” even where the employer was violating the Immigration Reform and Control Act by knowingly employing undocumented workers.  The workers in this case were...
read more

It’s Ok to Threaten Your Supervisor

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
08/05/2011
This week, a construction industry employer learned that it was illegal for it to fire two union-represented employees who had told a supervisor “it’s going to get ugly” and that the supervisor “better bring [his] boxing gloves” after the supervisor disciplined a group of employees for exceeding a 15-minute break limit.  The employer terminated the employees for violating its zero tolerance policy against workplace violence.  The National...
read more

Playing “Race Card” Wins Jury Trial on Retaliation Claim

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
08/01/2011
An African-American factory employee won the right to take his Title VII retaliation claim to a jury because his manager had accused him of “playing the race card.”  The employee “almost habitually” complained about poor treatment from a white co-worker, as well of racial discrimination in training and promotion decisions that he was denied.  In one particular meeting where the employee was being questioned about why he did not complete a...
read more

Workers’ Comp Remedy For Mad-Cow Disease

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
07/29/2011
by Kelly C. Lovett Workers’ compensation provides a valuable benefit to employers as the sole remedy for employees injured on the job.  As a result, employee lawsuits against employers for job-related injuries or illnesses usually are dismissed as soon as they are filed.  Occasionally, an employee will sue under a narrow exception to the workers’ compensation laws.  This was the case in the District of Columbia where a lab employee brought...
read more

Age Discrimination Or Technological Advancement?

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
07/29/2011
Plaintiffs suing for age discrimination must prove, as part of their prima facie case, that they were replaced by an individual outside of their protected class – that is, that they were replaced by someone younger.  What happens, though, if the employee is replaced by a computer program?  Can the employee establish a case of discrimination? The answer is “no,” according to the Eleventh Circuit.  That court held that a terminated employee...
read more

Sixth Circuit Addresses Associational Discrimination

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
07/14/2011
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits associational discrimination.  In other words, an employer cannot discriminate against an applicant or employee who has a relationship or association with an individual with a known disability.  42 U.S.C. § 12112(b)(4).  The EEOC explains that the ADA prohibits conduct such as: An employer is interviewing applicants for a computer programmer position.  The employer determines that one of the...
read more

How to Stay on the EEOC's Good Side

Darrell VanDeusen
Darrell VanDeusen
07/09/2011
I wrote about this last year, because in 2010, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission received nearly 100,000 new charges of workplace discrimination, the highest figure ever.  In the Baltimore Region, there were approximately 3,300 pending charges and about 13 investigators to handle them.   Well, 2011 was another banner year for charges being filed, and particularly in the Baltimore area.  The back log still exists and there is no quick...
read more

GINA and the FMLA: How to Avoid a Sticky Wicket

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
11/09/2010
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000ff, was enacted in 2008 to prevent discrimination on the basis of genetic information in employment and health insurance.  Title I of the Act focuses on issues in health insurance, and is administered by several federal Departments, while Title II prohibits employers from using genetic information in employment decision-making and is administered by the Equal Employment...
read more

FMLA Eleventh Amendment Immunity: Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals

Darrell VanDeusen
Darrell VanDeusen
09/09/2010
In Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals, 626 F.3d 187 (4th Cir. 2010), the Fourth Circuit joined five other appellate courts in holding that the self-care provision of the Family and Medical Leave Act, does not apply to the states because Congress did not properly abrogate the states’ Eleventh Amendment immunity.  Despite the lack of any apparent Circuit split on the issue, the Supreme Court granted Coleman’s petition for a writ of certiorari to...
read more
Email Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Loading