D.C. Amends Wage Theft Prevention Act to Remove Exempt Employee Time Tracking Requirement

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
02/12/2015
Last month, we wrote about the new District of Columbia Wage Theft Prevention Act, which dramatically changed D.C. wage and hour laws to impose new record keeping obligations and penalties on employers operating in the District.  The new law is set to go into effect on February 26, 2015. After posting our article on the law, we received a number of comments from clients concerned about the law's requirement that employers keep time records for...
read more

The Next Big Supreme Court Labor & Employment Class Action Case May Be Here

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
12/18/2014
On Monday, Pennsylvania’s highest court affirmed a $188 million award against Wal-Mart and Sam’s Club (collectively “Wal-Mart”) in a class action encompassing almost 187,000 employees who worked for Wal-Mart between 1998 and 2006. Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 32 EAP 2012 (Pa. Dec. 14, 2014). Employees were awarded back pay, because the retail giant promised them paid breaks but required them to miss or work through them and to work...
read more

Supreme Court Holds Time Spent in Security Screening is Not Compensable

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
12/11/2014
In a unanimous decision, the United States Supreme Court held Tuesday that time employees spend going through an employer’s theft-prevention security screening process is not compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) because the screening is not “integral and indispensable” to the worker’s principal activities. Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk, No. 13-1433 (Dec. 9, 2014). The Integrity employees involved in this case...
read more

More Than A Dollar: $2.3 Million Settlement Between Family Dollar Stores And Nearly 500 Employees

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
11/07/2014
On October 30, 2014, a Colorado federal court judge granted final approval of a $ 2.3 million settlement between the “Everything’s a Dollar” retail giant and a class of 488 current and former store managers who claimed they were misclassified as exempt employees and denied overtime pay in violation of state law. Under Colorado law, executive or supervisory employees are exempt from overtime pay if they supervise two or more full-time...
read more

If You Play Me, You Gotta' Pay Me: NCAA Student-Athletes File FLSA Suit

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
10/23/2014
A former NCAA Division I soccer player at the University of Houston has filed a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) collective action on behalf of herself and other Division I student-athletes. Samantha Sackos sued the NCAA and all of the NCAA Division I member schools, and claims that she should have been classified as a temporary employee of the schools as opposed to an uncompensated student-athlete. The lawsuit, filed this past Monday, can be found...
read more

Maryland Court Allows Satellite TV Installers Wage & Hours Claims to Proceed

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
10/22/2014
Maryland’s federal court recently permitted a collective action brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) to proceed to trial. In Butler, et al. v. Directsat USA, LLC, et. al. Jeffrey Butler filed suit on behalf of himself and other similarly situated satellite installation technicians pursuant to the FLSA, as well as Maryland’s Wage and Hour Law, Maryland’s Wage Payment and Collection Law and the District of Columbia’s Minimum...
read more

Court Rules Private Settlement Of FLSA Claims May Be Possible

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
09/19/2014
A different set of rules applies to settling wage and hours disputes under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).   Regular contract law does not apply, because the FLSA’s provisions are mandatory and generally are not subject to bargaining, waiver, modification by contract, or even settlement. Stated simply, an employee cannot waive his right to minimum wage or overtime. Therefore, for more than 30 years, since the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in...
read more

Maryland’s Highest Court Holds That Employees May Recover Treble Damages for Unpaid Overtime

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
08/18/2014
Last week, the Maryland Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Peters v. Early Healthcare Giver, Inc. a case that dramatically shifts the terrain of Maryland wage and hour law in employees’ favor. September Term 2013, No. 86 (Md. Aug. 13, 2014). Most significantly, Peters holds that employees suing for unpaid overtime may now be able to recover three times the amount of overtime at issue for a period of three years prior to filing suit. It is...
read more

Court Rules Feds' Delayed Paychecks During Shutdown Violates FLSA

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
08/05/2014
It wasn’t that long ago when, in October 2013, Congress failed to pass a budget and the federal government shut down. As evidenced by a recent opinion from the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the impact of the shutdown is not quite over. Martin v. United States, No. 13-834C (Fed. Cl. July 31, 2014). A week after the shutdown ended, a group of federal government employees filed suit alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29...
read more

How a $50 Garnishment Error Spawned a Class Action Lawsuit

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
04/25/2014
This case should serve as yet another example of the long and winding road that litigation can take when a seemingly minor issue is seen as something more. Maryland’s Court of Appeals recently issued its opinion in Bonita Marshall v. Safeway, Inc., No. 56, September Term.    In Safeway, Ms. Marshall was an employee of Safeway who was subject to a creditor’s wage garnishment in 2009.  When presented with the garnishment, Safeway calculated...
read more
Email Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Loading