“Gotcha Moment” Backfires on Lawyer

Darrell VanDeusen
Darrell VanDeusen
03/10/2021
I watched Perry Mason (played by Raymond Burr from 1957 to 1966) as a kid.  More about why that’s relevant in a bit.  If you have watched any TV courtroom drama – Matlock (played by Andy Griffith from 1986-1995) works if you were too young to watch Perry Mason – you know the drill:  the defense attorney represents falsely accused people and he manages to prove that by drawing out the real criminal on the witness stand, usually...
read more

Police Applicant’s “Regarded As” Disability Claim Gets A Second Chance

Darrell VanDeusen
Darrell VanDeusen
03/08/2021
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is most frequently associated with protecting individuals with actual disabilities and requiring employers to make reasonable accommodations (that are not undue hardships) to enable those individuals to perform the essential functions of their jobs.   What is sometimes overlooked (or possibly forgotten) is that the requirement of an “actual” disability is only one leg of the ADA triangle:...
read more

First Amendment Protections Mean Officer’s Claim Proceeds

Darrell VanDeusen
Darrell VanDeusen
01/13/2021
That pesky old First Amendment “freedom of speech thing” has been in the news a lot lately.  The issue of whether a public employee’s speech is protected has Supreme Court underpinnings. In Pickering v. Bd. of Ed. of Twp. High Sch. Dist., 391 U.S. 563 (1968) the Court created a balancing test that looks to whether an employee (1) spoke on a matter of public concern; (2) spoke as a private citizen rather than a public employee; and (3)...
read more

Two New Wage & Hour Opinion Letters from DOL

Darrell VanDeusen
Darrell VanDeusen
01/12/2021
In the final weeks of the Trump administration, the Department of Labor has been busy putting out guidance on wage and hour matters.   Let’s put aside last week’s Final Rule on independent contractors, issued January 6, 2021.  That rule is expected to face substantial challenge in court, so while it is an interesting change in approach by the DOL, all should recognize the uncertainty of its lasting effect. Please turn instead to two Wage...
read more

NLRB: “Salt Mine” for Employees Means ULP for Employer

Darrell VanDeusen
Darrell VanDeusen
11/27/2020
Unless you have been off the planet for the last four years, you’ve likely heard of The Federalist, the conservative online magazine “focused on culture, politics, and religion that publishes commentary on a wide variety of contemporary newsworthy and controversial topics.”  It’s a part of FDRLST Media, LLC, which also has websites, electronic newsletters and satellite radio shows.  The publisher of The Federalist is Ben Domenech.   As...
read more

Court Rejects Laches Claim Due to EEOC’s Delay

Darrell VanDeusen
Darrell VanDeusen
11/25/2020
One of my first cases as a baby lawyer was a sex harassment lawsuit brought by a former employee who waited over six years for a decision from the EEOC and Maryland Commission on Civil Rights (which did eventually dismiss the charge).  She got her notice of right to sue and, with the help of very able counsel, filed her lawsuit.  No one (still alive) recalled her complaining or supported her claim, but she testified that she had raised her...
read more

DOL Proposes New Independent Contractor Rule

Darrell VanDeusen
Darrell VanDeusen
09/22/2020
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced on September 21, 2020 a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that re-defines “employee” under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) as it relates to independent contractors.  https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/flsa/2020-independent-contractor-nprm.  The  NPRM is available for review and public comment for 30 days after it is published in the Federal Register. The issue of who qualifies as...
read more

In Its Own Backyard: EEOC Must Confront Discrimination Lawsuit by Former Attorney

Darrell VanDeusen
Darrell VanDeusen
09/21/2020
Those of us who deal with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on a regular basis sometimes lose track of the fact that it, like the folks we represent as management attorneys, is an employer too.  And, it is subject to many of the same anti-discrimination and anti-retaliation legal requirements as the employers it investigates.  A recent decision from the D.C. Circuit shows that even the EEOC is sometimes required to explain its actions...
read more

Oh Please, Please, Cut it Out.

Darrell VanDeusen
Darrell VanDeusen
07/24/2020
My last blog focused on the NLRB’s July 21, 2020 decision in General Motors LLC, N.L.R.B., 369 NLRB No. 127 (7/21/20), returning to the Wright Line test when an employee uses profane language in the workplace and the resulting discipline that should occur.  In overturning a number of prior decisions, NLRB Chair John Ring said: “the Board has protected employees who engage in obscene, racist, and sexually harassing speech not tolerated in almost...
read more

Wright Line is Baaaaaaaack. No More Cussin’ Folks.

Darrell VanDeusen
Darrell VanDeusen
07/22/2020
One of the first cases I worked on as a baby lawyer involved a guy who was fired for cussing out his supervisor.  The employee’s union claimed that it was really because of his protected union activity; he was simply disagreeing with his boss.  Colorfully.  Very colorfully.  I was tasked to figure out whether the company should rescind the termination.  The answer was no:  the “Wright Line” test (based on the NLRB’s decision in Wright...
read more
Email Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Loading