Age Discrimination Or Technological Advancement?

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
07/29/2011
Plaintiffs suing for age discrimination must prove, as part of their prima facie case, that they were replaced by an individual outside of their protected class – that is, that they were replaced by someone younger.  What happens, though, if the employee is replaced by a computer program?  Can the employee establish a case of discrimination? The answer is “no,” according to the Eleventh Circuit.  That court held that a terminated employee...
read more

Sixth Circuit Addresses Associational Discrimination

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
07/14/2011
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits associational discrimination.  In other words, an employer cannot discriminate against an applicant or employee who has a relationship or association with an individual with a known disability.  42 U.S.C. § 12112(b)(4).  The EEOC explains that the ADA prohibits conduct such as: An employer is interviewing applicants for a computer programmer position.  The employer determines that one of the...
read more

How to Stay on the EEOC's Good Side

Darrell VanDeusen
Darrell VanDeusen
07/09/2011
I wrote about this last year, because in 2010, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission received nearly 100,000 new charges of workplace discrimination, the highest figure ever.  In the Baltimore Region, there were approximately 3,300 pending charges and about 13 investigators to handle them.   Well, 2011 was another banner year for charges being filed, and particularly in the Baltimore area.  The back log still exists and there is no quick...
read more

GINA and the FMLA: How to Avoid a Sticky Wicket

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
11/09/2010
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000ff, was enacted in 2008 to prevent discrimination on the basis of genetic information in employment and health insurance.  Title I of the Act focuses on issues in health insurance, and is administered by several federal Departments, while Title II prohibits employers from using genetic information in employment decision-making and is administered by the Equal Employment...
read more

FMLA Eleventh Amendment Immunity: Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals

Darrell VanDeusen
Darrell VanDeusen
09/09/2010
In Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals, 626 F.3d 187 (4th Cir. 2010), the Fourth Circuit joined five other appellate courts in holding that the self-care provision of the Family and Medical Leave Act, does not apply to the states because Congress did not properly abrogate the states’ Eleventh Amendment immunity.  Despite the lack of any apparent Circuit split on the issue, the Supreme Court granted Coleman’s petition for a writ of certiorari to...
read more

The Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act: A Bad Law at a Bad Time

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
04/15/2010
Over the past year, the “card check” legislation ironically known as the Employee Free Choice Act (“EFCA”) has garnered a lot of attention.  With large Democratic majorities in both chambers of Congress and a liberal Democrat in the White House, it seemed only a matter of time until organized labor received a payoff for its nearly $10 million dollar investment in President Obama and EFCA became law. Now, as EFCA languishes in the Senate...
read more

The Availability of the Mixed-Motive Theory in FMLA Retaliation Cases

Darrell VanDeusen
Darrell VanDeusen
02/05/2010
Mixed-motive theory was legislated into Title VII with the 1991 Civil Rights Act.  The theory provides that an employee may prevail in a case in which she demonstrates that illegal considerations were “a motivating factor” in the adverse employment decision, even where the employer would have made the same decision absent the illegal considerations. There is no similar provision under the FMLA (or any other anti-discrimination law for that...
read more

Department Of Labor Issues Guidance On Reducing Pay For Furloughs

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
09/09/2009
As employers try to navigate the economic downturn, companies are increasingly turning to temporary furloughs to save labor costs.  When furloughing employees, employers require staff to use accrued leave or take unpaid time off.  However, if not done properly, this practice could result in employers converting otherwise exempt employees into non-exempt staff who become entitled to overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act and its state law...
read more

Maryland General Assembly Clarifies Flexible Leave Act

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
05/19/2009
On October 1, 2008, Maryland’s Flexible Leave Act (“MFLA”) went into effect.  The law, which applies to employers with 15 or more employees, requires businesses that provide employees with any form of paid leave to permit employees to use such leave for the illness of an immediate family member. The original version of the MFLA left many questions unanswered. For example, neither "illness" nor "immediate family member" was defined in the law....
read more
Email Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Loading