DOL Proposes Rulemaking on Servicemember FMLA and More

Kollman & Saucier
01/31/2012
On January 31, 2012, the Department of Labor (DOL) released proposed changes to the agency’s Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) regulations, which were published in the Federal Register on February 15.  This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), a necessary precursor to any regulatory change, seeks comments from interested parties by April 16.  Comments may be submitted, identified by Regulatory Information Number (RIN) 1235–AA03, by...
read more

Supreme Court Holds “Ministerial Exception” Stops Discrimination Claims

Kollman & Saucier
01/11/2012
In a decision that many are calling a resounding victory for religious organizations, the Supreme Court has unanimously decided that the First Amendment’s establishment and free exercise clauses create a “ministerial exception” that bars an ADA lawsuit (and by extension all discrimination cases) brought against a religious organization by a former elementary school teacher who was a Lutheran “commissioned minister.  Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical...
read more

NLRB Invalidates Arbitration Agreement that Precludes Class Claims

Kollman & Saucier
01/10/2012
Two members of the NLRB (and with one member recusing himself) held that an employer violated the National Labor Relations Act by requiring non-union employees to sign a mandatory arbitration agreement that waived employees’ rights to participate in class or collective actions.  D.R. Horton Inc., 357 N.L.R.B. No. 184, (January 3, 2012). NLRB Chairman Mark Pearce and Member Craig Becker found that D.R. Horton Inc.'s mandatory arbitration...
read more

EEOC Ordered to Pay Company's Legal Fees

Kollman & Saucier
11/03/2011
It doesn't happen very often, but sometimes courts find that the EEOC has overreached so greatly in its prosecution of a claim that a win for the employer is not enough - the EEOC is required to pay the company's legal fees too.  This just happened in EEOC v. TriCore Reference Labs., No. 09-CV-956 (D. New Mexico Oct. 26, 2011), where the court found that the EEOC's decision to continue pursuing an ADA reasonable accommodation case was  "frivolous,...
read more

Fourth Circuit Holds Gang Members = Employees

Kollman & Saucier
11/01/2011
In United States v. Weaver, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 21485 (4th Cir. Oct. 24 2011), the Fourth Circuit held that the Federal law prohibiting a person "employed for" a convicted felon from carrying a firearm applies to gang members.  Floyd Moore was the national vice president of the Pagans Motorcycle Club (PMC) and a convicted felon.  Weaver and others were PMC members and took orders from Moore.  As a convicted felon, Moore was prohibited from carrying a...
read more

No FMLA Claim for "Exacerbation" of Condition

Kollman & Saucier
11/01/2011
Last month the Seventh Circuit - the most active appellate court interpreting the FMLA - dismissed a claim by an employee who claimed that his supervisor's conduct exacerbated his pre-existing serious health condition.  Breneisen v. Motorola Inc., 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18301 (7th Cir. Sept. 2, 2011).  This was a case of first impression for the court, but it followed the Sixth Circuit's reasoning in Edgar v. JAC Prods. Inc., 443 F.3d 501 (6th Cir....
read more

Maryland Court of Appeals Continues to Limit Wrongful Discharge Cases

Kollman & Saucier
09/26/2011
The common law doctrine of "employment at will" permits either an employer or employee to terminate the employment relationship at any time or for any reason.   Maryland courts are reluctant to diminish employers' decision-making discretion, but the a tort claim of "wrongful discharge" has been recognized in limited circumstances.  The seminal case in Maryland is Adler v. Am. Standard Corp., 291 Md. 31 (1981).  In Adler, an employee filed a...
read more

What Does “To Care For” Mean Under the FMLA?

Kollman & Saucier
09/13/2011
The FMLA provides that an employee may take leave to care for a parent, spouse, son or daughter who has a serious health condition.  29 U.S.C. § 2612(a)(1)(c).  An employee can take leave to care for a parent or spouse of any age who, because of a serious mental or physical condition, is in a hospital or other health care facility, or who is at home but unable to care for his or her own basic hygienic or nutritional needs or safety.  So, no...
read more

Burlington Definition of Retaliation Appropriate Under the FMLA

Kollman & Saucier
08/24/2011
The Second Circuit has joined five other Circuits in holding that the correct definition of a "materially adverse employment action" in FMLA retaliation cases is the one used by Supreme Court in its 2006 decision in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White.  The Burlington definition includes employer actions that are likely to dissuade reasonable workers from exercising their rights under anti-discrimination laws.  Millea v....
read more

Fourth Circuit Holds Job Applicant Cannot Sue Prospective Employer for FLSA Retaliation

Kollman & Saucier
08/22/2011
Affirming dismissal of an FLSA suit against SAIC, the Fourth Circuit has held that a job applicant who alleged the company withdrew a conditional offer of employment upon learning that she had sued a former employer for wage and hour violations cannot pursue an FLSA retaliation claim against the prospective employer because the Act only permits "employees" to file retaliation claims against their current or former employer.  Dellinger v. SAIC, No....
read more
Email Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Loading